Recommending Objects To A User Of A Social Networking System Based On The Location Of The User

ABSTRACT

A social networking system recommends objects, such as pages, of the social networking system to users of the social networking system based on the location of the user. The social networking system obtains location information identifying the location of the user. Based on the location of the user, the social networking system identifies levels of geographical partitions encompassing the location of the user. For each level of geographical partitions, the social networking system accesses relevant objects of the social networking system with connections to users located within the level of geographical partitions. The social networking system may have determined a term frequency-inverse document frequency (tf-idf) value for each relevant object. Based on the number of connections and the tf-idf value associated with each relevant object, the social networking system merges the relevant objects accessed at each level into a set of relevant objects to recommend to the user.

BACKGROUND

This invention generally relates to social networking systems, and moreparticularly to recommending objects or pages to new users of the socialnetworking system.

A social networking system allows its users to connect to and interactwith other social networking system users and with objects on the socialnetworking system. As a user on a social networking system interactswith various objects (e.g., pages for businesses, content items postedon the social networking system, profiles of users on the socialnetworking system, etc.), the user develops a history of interactingwith objects. This interaction history also provides information about auser, including the user's interests. Based on these types ofinformation associated with a user, the social networking system mayrecommend objects or pages to the user, encouraging the user to interactwith the recommended objects. For example, if a user has “liked” orbecome a fan of certain types of pages on the social networking systemin the past, the social networking system can recommend pages to thatuser that are similar to the ones the user has previously “liked.”

However, for users new to the social networking system or with little orno information regarding tastes, preferences or connections, the socialnetworking system is often unable to generate accurate recommendationsof objects to provide to the users. Modern recommender systems that areoften used by social networking systems typically use three types ofrecommendation strategies; user-user, item-item, and user-item. Each ofthese systems requires a model of a user to derive recommendations. Foruser-user recommender systems, the model must provide a similaritymeasurement between users. And for both item-item and user-item, themodel must provide a set of previously rated entities for user. None ofthese foundations supports generating recommendations for a new userswith little to no information stored in the social networking system.Hence users with little or no information stored with the socialnetworking system provide a challenge for recommendation systems. Thisis sometimes referred to as the cold-start problem.

SUMMARY

The social networking system recommends objects, such as pages (e.g.,pages representing businesses, brands, or organizations to which userscan connect by, for example, “liking” the page), of the socialnetworking system to users of the social networking system based on thelocation of the user. This allows the social networking system toprovide recommendations to new users or users for whom there is littleor no information stored in the social networking system, but for whomlocation information can be determined, since the system can leveragegeographic location of the user to recommend objects related to thatlocation. The social networking system obtains location informationidentifying the location of a user from, for example, locationinformation from a user profile, from the user's client device, amongother sources. Based on the location of the user, the social networkingsystem identifies levels of geographical partitions encompassing thelocation of the user, such as neighborhoods, zip codes, cities,counties, regions, states, countries, etc. that encompass the user'sprimary residence to form a geographical hierarchy.

For each level of geographical partitions associated with the hierarchy,the social networking system identifies or accesses already identifiedrelevant objects of the social networking system with one or moreconnections to users located within the level of geographical partitions(e.g., pages that have user fans that are in a particular zip code orcity). In one embodiment, the social networking system determinesrelevant objects in a geographical partition using a termfrequency-inverse document frequency (tf-idf) value for each relevantobject. In one example, the tf-idf algorithm applied to determine atf-idf value for an object locally relevant to a level of geographicalpartitions is modified to further bias towards identifying locallyrelevant objects, by normalizing the term frequency against the expectedvalue of connections for a level of geographic partitions for example.Based on the number of connections and the tf-idf value associated witheach relevant object, the social networking system can rank eachrelevant object. The social networking system may use a variety oftechniques to merge the relevant objects at each level of geographicalpartitions into a single set of relevant objects. For example, thesocial networking system may select relevant objects having more than athreshold number of connections to users located with a level ofgeographical partitions to include in the set of relevant objects.

In another example, the social networking system 140 applies a machinelearning algorithm to determine the relevant importance of each level ofgeographic partitions with respect to identifying and recommendingrelevant objects to a user. For example, the social networking system140 applies a machine learning process to predict the probability of auser connecting with a relevant object (e.g., fanning a page) based onthe demographic information associated with the relevant object and theuser, engagement information associated with the relevant object, and/orthe demographic information associated with one or more levels ofgeographic partitions associated with the relevant object. Based on theprobability of a user connecting with the relevant objects, the socialnetworking system 140 may merge the relevant objects into a single setof relevant objects. The social networking system may then select one ormore relevant objects from the merged set of relevant objects torecommend to the user.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a system environment in which a socialnetworking system operates, according to one embodiment.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a social networking system, according toone embodiment.

FIG. 3 a and FIG. 3 b are flow charts of a method for recommendingobjects to a user of a social networking system, according to oneembodiment.

FIG. 4 is an example of recommending objects to a user of a socialnetworking system, according to one embodiment.

The figures depict various embodiments of the present invention forpurposes of illustration only. One skilled in the art will readilyrecognize from the following discussion that alternative embodiments ofthe structures and methods illustrated herein may be employed withoutdeparting from the principles of the invention described herein.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION System Architecture

FIG. 1 is a high level block diagram of a system environment 100 for asocial networking system 140. The system environment 100 shown by FIG. 1comprises one or more client devices 110, a network 120, one or morethird-party systems 130, and the social networking system 140. Inalternative configurations, different and/or additional components maybe included in the system environment 100. The embodiments describedherein can be adapted to online systems that are not social networkingsystems.

The client devices 110 are one or more computing devices capable ofreceiving user input as well as transmitting and/or receiving data viathe network 120. In one embodiment, a client device 110 is aconventional computer system, such as a desktop or laptop computer.Alternatively, a client device 110 may be a device having computerfunctionality, such as a personal digital assistant (PDA), a mobiletelephone, a smartphone or another suitable device. A client device 110is configured to communicate via the network 120. In one embodiment, aclient device 110 executes an application allowing a user of the clientdevice 110 to interact with the social networking system 140. Forexample, a client device 110 executes a browser application to enableinteraction between the client device 110 and the social networkingsystem 140 via the network 120. In another embodiment, a client device110 interacts with the social networking system 140 through anapplication programming interface (API) running on a native operatingsystem of the client device 110, such as IOS® or ANDROID™.

The client devices 110 are configured to communicate via the network120, which may comprise any combination of local area and/or wide areanetworks, using both wired and/or wireless communication systems. In oneembodiment, the network 120 uses standard communications technologiesand/or protocols. For example, the network 120 includes communicationlinks using technologies such as Ethernet, 802.11, worldwideinteroperability for microwave access (WiMAX), 3G, 4G, code divisionmultiple access (CDMA), digital subscriber line (DSL), etc. Examples ofnetworking protocols used for communicating via the network 120 includemultiprotocol label switching (MPLS), transmission controlprotocol/Internet protocol (TCP/IP), hypertext transport protocol(HTTP), simple mail transfer protocol (SMTP), and file transfer protocol(FTP). Data exchanged over the network 120 may be represented using anysuitable format, such as hypertext markup language (HTML) or extensiblemarkup language (XML). In some embodiments, all or some of thecommunication links of the network 120 may be encrypted using anysuitable technique or techniques.

One or more third party systems 130 may be coupled to the network 120for communicating with the social networking system 140, which isfurther described below in conjunction with FIG. 2. In one embodiment, athird party system 130 is an application provider communicatinginformation describing applications for execution by a client device 110or communicating data to client devices 110 for use by an applicationexecuting on the client device. In other embodiments, a third partysystem 130 provides content or other information for presentation via aclient device 110. A third party website 130 may also communicateinformation to the social networking system 140, such as advertisements,content, or information about an application provided by the third partywebsite 130.

FIG. 2 is an example block diagram of an architecture of the socialnetworking system 140. The social networking system 140 shown in FIG. 2includes a user profile store 205, a content store 210, an action logger215, an action log 220, an edge store 225, a recommendation engine 235and a web server 265. In other embodiments, the social networking system140 may include additional, fewer, or different components for variousapplications. Conventional components such as network interfaces,security functions, load balancers, failover servers, management andnetwork operations consoles, and the like are not shown so as to notobscure the details of the system architecture.

Each user of the social networking system 140 is associated with a userprofile, which is stored in the user profile store 205. A user profileincludes declarative information about the user that was explicitlyshared by the user and may also include profile information inferred bythe social networking system 140. In one embodiment, a user profileincludes multiple data fields, each describing one or more attributes ofthe corresponding user of the social networking system 140. Examples ofinformation stored in a user profile include biographic, demographic,and other types of descriptive information, such as work experience,educational history, gender, hobbies or preferences, location and thelike. A user profile may also store other information provided by theuser, for example, images or videos. In certain embodiments, images ofusers may be tagged with identification information of users of thesocial networking system 140 displayed in an image. A user profile inthe user profile store 205 may also maintain references to actions bythe corresponding user performed on content items in the content store210 and stored in the action log 220.

In on example, the user may provide to the social networking system 140location information for the social networking system 140 to include inthe user's user profile. The user may provide the social networkingsystem 140 with a home or work address associated with the user'sresidence or work place, for example. In another example, the user mayallow the social networking system 140 to ascertain location informationassociated with the user. For example, the user may give the socialnetworking system 140 permission to retrieve location informationassociated with one or more devices used by the user. The socialnetworking system 140, on receiving permission, may retrieve, forexample, Global Positioning System (GPS) coordinates associated with auser's device. Based on the retrieved GPS coordinates, the socialnetworking system 140 identifies the location associated with the user,and associates the location with the user's user profile stored in theuser profile store 205. In one example, the social networking system 140identifies the GPS coordinate at which the user's user device occupiesthe most time or more than a threshold amount of time and associates thelocation information determined from the GPS coordinate with the user'suser profile.

While user profiles in the user profile store 205 are frequentlyassociated with individuals, allowing individuals to interact with eachother via the social networking system 140, user profiles may also bestored for entities such as businesses or organizations. This allows anentity to establish a presence on the social networking system 140 forconnecting and exchanging content with other social networking systemusers. The entity may post information about itself, about its productsor provide other information to users of the social networking systemusing a brand page associated with the entity's user profile. Otherusers of the social networking system may connect to the brand page toreceive information posted to the brand page or to receive informationfrom the brand page. A user profile associated with the brand page mayinclude information about the entity itself, providing users withbackground or informational data about the entity.

The content store 210 stores objects that each represent various typesof content. Examples of content represented by an object include a pagepost, a status update, a photograph, a video, a link, a shared contentitem, a gaming application achievement, a check-in event at a localbusiness, a brand page, an event page, or any other type of content.Thus, the brand page described above can be an object within the socialnetworking system. Social networking system users may create objectsstored by the content store 210, such as status updates, photos taggedby users to be associated with other objects in the social networkingsystem, events, groups, applications or pages representing anindividual, group or business. In some embodiments, objects are receivedfrom third-party applications or third-party applications separate fromthe social networking system 140. In one embodiment, objects in thecontent store 210 represent single pieces of content, or content“items.” Hence, users of the social networking system 140 are encouragedto communicate with each other by posting text and content items ofvarious types of media through various communication channels. Thisincreases the amount of interaction of users with each other andincreases the frequency with which users interact within the socialnetworking system 140.

The content store may also store one or more recommendation units. Thesocial networking system provides recommendation units to its users toincrease user interaction with the social networking system. Arecommendation unit suggests one or more actions to a user viewing therecommendation unit (a “viewing user”) to increase the viewing user'sinteraction with the social networking system. For example, arecommendation unit provides a suggestion for the viewing user toestablish a connection with another user as well as a link enabling theuser to do so. In other examples, a recommendation unit encourages theviewing user to invite a friend to an event, identify a friend in aphoto, interact or view an object such as a page representing a localbusiness, or perform another suitable action with the social networkingsystem. Thus, a recommendation unit can provide a suggestion to a userto, for example, “like” a brand page for a business. Each recommendationunit is associated with a score based on a value of the viewing userinteracting with the recommendation unit (i.e., “converting” therecommendation unit by performing the recommended action) and/or on thelikelihood that the viewing user will convert the recommendation unit.The score may be based on prior interaction with recommendation units bythe viewing user, other users to whom the viewing user is connected, aprobability of the viewing user interacting with the recommendationunit, or other criteria. Determination of a score for a recommendationunit is further described in U.S. patent application Ser. No.13/549,080, filed on Jul. 13, 2012, which is hereby incorporated byreference in its entirety. The social networking system selects one ormore recommendation units to send to a user based at least in part onthis score.

The action logger 215 receives communications about user actionsinternal to and/or external to the social networking system 140,populating the action log 220 with information about user actions.Examples of actions include adding a connection to another user, sendinga message to another user, uploading an image, reading a message fromanother user, viewing content associated with another user, attending anevent posted by another user, among others. In addition, a number ofactions may involve an object and one or more particular users, so theseactions are associated with those users as well and stored in the actionlog 220.

The action log 220 may be used by the social networking system 140 totrack user actions on the social networking system 140, as well asactions on third party systems 130 that communicate information to thesocial networking system 140. Users may interact with various objects onthe social networking system 140, and information describing theseinteractions are stored in the action log 210. Examples of interactionswith objects include: commenting on posts, sharing links, andchecking-in to physical locations via a mobile device, accessing contentitems, showing interest in pages by “fanning” or “liking” the pages andany other interactions. Additional examples of interactions with objectson the social networking system 140 that are included in the action log220 include: commenting on a photo album, communicating with a user,establishing a connection with an object, joining an event to acalendar, joining a group, creating an event, authorizing anapplication, using an application, expressing a preference for an object(“liking” the object) and engaging in a transaction. Additionally, theaction log 220 may record a user's interactions with advertisements onthe social networking system 140 as well as with other applicationsoperating on the social networking system 140. In some embodiments, datafrom the action log 220 is used to infer interests or preferences of auser, augmenting the interests included in the user's user profile andallowing a more complete understanding of user preferences.

The action log 220 may also store user actions taken on a third partysystem 130, such as an external website, and communicated to the socialnetworking system 140. For example, an e-commerce website that primarilysells sporting equipment at bargain prices may recognize a user of asocial networking system 140 through a social plug-in enabling thee-commerce website to identify the user of the social networking system140. Because users of the social networking system 140 are uniquelyidentifiable, e-commerce websites, such as this sporting equipmentretailer, may communicate information about a user's actions outside ofthe social networking system 140 to the social networking system 140 forassociation with the user. Hence, the action log 220 may recordinformation about actions users perform on a third party system 130,including webpage viewing histories, advertisements that were engaged,purchases made, and other patterns from shopping and buying.

In one embodiment, an edge store 225 stores information describingconnections between users and other objects on the social networkingsystem 140 as edges. Some edges may be defined by users, allowing usersto specify their relationships with other users. For example, users maygenerate edges with other users that parallel the users' real-liferelationships, such as friends, co-workers, partners, and so forth.Other edges are generated when users interact with objects in the socialnetworking system 140, such as expressing interest in a page on thesocial networking system, sharing a link with other users of the socialnetworking system, and commenting on posts made by other users of thesocial networking system.

In one embodiment, an edge may include various features eachrepresenting characteristics of interactions between users, interactionsbetween users and object, or interactions between objects. For example,features included in an edge describe rate of interaction between twousers, how recently two users have interacted with each other, the rateor amount of information retrieved by one user about an object, or thenumber and types of comments posted by a user about an object. Thefeatures may also represent information describing a particular objector user. For example, a feature may represent the level of interest thata user has in a particular topic, the rate at which the user logs intothe social networking system 140, or information describing demographicinformation about a user. Each feature may be associated with a sourceobject or user, a target object or user, and a feature value. A featuremay be specified as an expression based on values describing the sourceobject or user, the target object or user, or interactions between thesource object or user and target object or user; hence, an edge may berepresented as one or more feature expressions.

The edge store 225 also stores information about edges, such as affinityscores for objects, interests, and other users. Affinity scores, or“affinities,” may be computed by the social networking system 140 overtime to approximate a user's affinity for an object, interest, and otherusers in the social networking system 140 based on the actions performedby the user. A user's affinity may be computed by the social networkingsystem 140 over time to approximate a user's affinity for an object,interest, and other users in the social networking system 140 based onthe actions performed by the user. Computation of affinity is furtherdescribed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/978,265, filed on Dec.23, 2010, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/690,254, filed on Nov. 30,2012, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/689,969, filed on Nov. 30,2012, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/690,088, filed on Nov. 30,2012, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.Multiple interactions between a user and a specific object may be storedas a single edge in the edge store 225, in one embodiment.Alternatively, each interaction between a user and a specific object isstored as a separate edge. In some embodiments, connections betweenusers may be stored in the user profile store 205, or the user profilestore 205 may access the edge store 225 to determine connections betweenusers.

Using data from the user profile store 205 and the edge store 225, therecommendation engine 235 identifies one or more objects to recommend toa user of the social networking system 140. The recommendation engine235 identifies objects potentially relevant to a user, or objects that auser may be interested in interacting with on the social networkingsystem 140. In one embodiment, the recommendation engine 235 retrievesdata included in a user profile associated with a user, such as locationinformation identifying the primary location occupied by a user, andrecommends one or more objects to the user via one or morerecommendation units, as further described below in conjunction withFIG. 3. In one embodiment, the recommendation engine 235 identifiesobjects stored in the content store that have explicit connections withone or more users (as determined from data in the edge store 225)located in geographical areas encompassing the location informationassociated with the user to whom the recommendation engine isrecommending objects. The recommendation engine 235 ranks the identifiedobjects and selects one or more of the ranked objects to recommend tothe user via recommendation units.

The web server 250 links the social networking system 140 via thenetwork 120 to the one or more client devices 110, as well as to the oneor more third party systems 130. The web server 140 serves web pages, aswell as other web-related content, such as JAVA®, FLASH®, XML and soforth. The web server 250 may receive and route messages between thesocial networking system 140 and the client device 110, for example,instant messages, queued messages (e.g., email), text messages, shortmessage service (SMS) messages, or messages sent using any othersuitable messaging technique. A user may send a request to the webserver 250 to upload information (e.g., images or videos) that arestored in the content store 210. Additionally, the web server 250 mayprovide application programming interface (API) functionality to senddata directly to native client device operating systems, such as IOS®,ANDROID™, WEBOS® or RIM®.

Recommending Objects to a User

FIG. 3 a and FIG. 3 b are flow charts of one embodiment of a method forrecommending objects to a user of a social networking system. In oneembodiment, the functionality described in conjunction with FIG. 3 a andFIG. 3 b is performed by the recommendation engine 235; however, inother embodiments, any suitable component or combination of componentsmay provide the functionality described in conjunction with FIG. 3 a andFIG. 3 b. Additionally, in some embodiments, different and/or additionalsteps than those identified in FIG. 3 a and FIG. 3 b may be performed orthe steps identified in FIG. 3 a and FIG. 3 b may be performed indifferent orders.

FIG. 3 a is a flowchart illustrating an example method for identifyingand ranking relevant objects located within a level of geographicalpartitions. The social networking system 140 identifies levels ofgeographical partitions encompassing a geographical area. A level ofgeographical partitions refers to a geographical area, having a specificresolution or granularity, and encompassing a geographical location. Forexample, a zip code, a city that includes the zip code, a region orprovince that includes the city, and the state that includes the regionmight all be different geographical partitions that essentially form ahierarchy of levels. Multiple zip codes would represent a single levelof geographical partitions, with each zip code having specificdimensions, geographical properties and being partitioned from other zipcodes. The multiple zip codes may belong to a single state, therebymaking the state the level of geographical partitions within which themultiple zip codes are located. Similarly, neighborhoods, counties,states and countries are examples of different levels of geographicalpartitions, as they represent different resolutions or granularities ofa geographical area.

For each level of geographical partitions, the social networking system140 identifies 315 relevant objects, such as pages. The relevant objectsrepresent objects that one located within a geographical partition, suchas a zip code, would find relevant, or objects with which one would beinterested in interacting. New users joining the social networkingsystem 140, who have not yet expressed an interest in a variety ofobjects within the social networking system 140, may be interested ininteracting with objects in which users of the social networking system140 located within or near the new user's location have shown aninterest.

In one embodiment, for each level of geographical partitions, the socialnetworking system 140 identifies 315 objects in the content store 210having location information within the geographical partition. Forexample, the social networking system 140 identifies objects in thecontent store 210 having locations within a state as objects relevant tousers within the state. A business page of a restaurant might be oneexample of an object that has location information within a geographicalpartition. Specifically, the business/restaurant in this example mightbe located within a particular zip code, and hence has locationinformation within that zip code.

In another embodiment, for each level of geographical partitions, thesocial networking system 140 identifies objects in the content store 210that have explicit connections with one or more users of the socialnetworking system 140, and the one or more users are located within thelevel of geographical partitions. For example, for an identified zipcode (level of geographical partitions), the social networking system140 identifies objects that have explicit connections to one or moreusers located within the identified zip code, such as users who have“liked” the object. Similarly, for an identified state (level ofgeographical partitions), the social networking system 140 identifiesobjects that have explicit connections to one or more users locatedwithin the state. For each level of geographical partitions the socialnetworking system 140 may identify 315 objects having more than athreshold number of connections to users located in the level ofgeographical partitions as relevant objects. In addition to identifying315 relevant objects for each level of geographical partitions, thesocial networking system may also associate the object with anidentifier, the identifier identifying the level of geographicalpartitions from which the relevant object was identified or determined.

Apart from identifying relevant objects associated with a geographicpartition or a level of geographic partitions, based on a thresholdnumber of connections associated with an object, the social networkingsystem 140 may use one or more algorithms to identify objects that aremore relevant to the level of geographical partitions as opposed toglobally. It is possible that objects with strong regional connectionsare more compelling connections to a new user than globally popular butnot regionally relevant objects. For example, objects may haveconnections to users located in a variety of locations in addition tousers located within a geographical location. The social networkingsystem 140 may identify objects with a greater proportion of connectionsto users located within a geographical partition or a level ofgeographical partitions as objects relevant to the level of geographicalpartitions. In one example, the social networking system 140 applies theterm frequency-inverse document frequency (tf-idf) algorithm to identifyobjects specifically relevant to a level of geographical partitions. Thedocument frequency identifies how unique an object is to a level ofgeographical partitions (for example, objects that appear in a fewlocations within a level of geographical partitions are considered asunique).

For each level of geographic partitions, the social networking system140 identifies objects having connections to users located within thelevel of geographic partitions (e.g., pages that have been fanned withina given zip code). For each identified object, the social networkingsystem 140 determines a term frequency and an inverse documentfrequency. The term frequency for an object is determined based on thenumber of connections between the object and users located within thelevel of geographic partitions (e.g., the fan frequency for a page). Theinverse document frequency is the number of locations within a level ofgeographical locations, such as zip codes within a state or stateswithin a country, with at least one user that has a connection with theobject (e.g., the number of zip codes in which the page has beenfanned). The tf-idf value assigned to the document is the product of theterm frequency and the inverse document frequency. For example, for azip code, the social networking system 140 identifies pages havingconnections to users located within the zip code. For each of the pages,the social networking system 140 determines a term frequency, which isthe number of connections between the page and users located within thezip code, and an inverse document frequency, which is the number oflocations within the zip code with at least one user connected to thepage. The tf-idf value assigned to each page is then the product of theterm frequency of the page and the inverse document frequency of thepage.

The following equations outline an exemplary process for determining thetf-idf value assigned to an object. The variables used in the equationsare defined as: tf refers to term frequency, idf refers to the documentfrequency, c refers to locations within a level of geographicallocations, u refers to the users, p refers to objects, and G refers to alevel of geographical locations. The term frequency is determined usingthe following equation:

tf(p,c)=|{uεc: u connections p}  (1)

The inverse document frequency is determined using the followingequation:

$\begin{matrix}{{{idf}( {p,G} )} = {\log \frac{G}{\{ {c \in {G\text{:}\mspace{14mu} {\exists{u \in {c\mspace{14mu} {such}\mspace{14mu} {that}\mspace{14mu} u\mspace{14mu} {connected}\mspace{14mu} {to}\mspace{14mu} p}}}}} \} }}} & (2)\end{matrix}$

The tf-idf value assigned to an object is the product of the termfrequency and the inverse document frequency.

In one embodiment, the tf-idf algorithm applied to identify objectslocally relevant to a level of geographical partitions is modified tofurther bias towards identifying locally relevant objects, bynormalizing the term frequency against the expected value of connectionsfor a level of geographic partitions. The modified term frequencyidentifies how locally popular an object is to the users within a levelof geographical partitions, while the document frequency identifies howunique an object is to a level of geographical partitions (for example,objects that appear in a few levels of geographical partitions areconsidered as unique). For example, the term frequency for an objectwith respect to a particular zip code, may be normalized by the expectednumber of connections for that zip code. The expected number ofconnections may be determined by dividing the total number ofconnections associated with an object, by the number of zip codesincluding users connected to the object. Below is an example equationfor determining the modified term frequency (tf′).

$\begin{matrix}{{{tf}^{\prime}( {p,c} )} = \frac{{tf}( {p,c} )}{\log \frac{F(p)}{\{ {c \in {G\text{:}\mspace{14mu} {\exists{u \in {c\mspace{14mu} {such}\mspace{14mu} {that}\mspace{14mu} u\mspace{14mu} {connected}\mspace{14mu} {to}\mspace{14mu} p}}}}} \} }}} & (3)\end{matrix}$

where F(p) refers to the total number of connections associated with anobject across all levels of geographical partitions, and locationswithin all the levels of geographical partitions. A modified tf-idfvalue may then be calculated by determining the product of the modifiedterm frequency value (tf′) and the inverse document frequency (idf)associated with an object.

In one embodiment, the social networking system 140 identifies objectsthat are unique to a level of geographical partitions to recommend tousers based on the locality associated with the object. For example, thesocial networking system 140 may identify thresholds associated with thelocal popularity (LP) of an object, and a document frequency (DF)associated with the object. Based on the thresholds the socialnetworking system 140 filters out objects which do not meet the LP andDF thresholds. In one example, the thresholds are determinedempirically. The LP associated with an object may be determined byidentifying the number of connections associated with an object from alevel of geographical partitions. The document frequency characterizeshow unique an object is to a level of geographical partitions. Below isan example equation to determine the document frequency associated withan object.

$\begin{matrix}{{{DF}( {p,c} )} = \frac{G}{\{ {c \in {G\text{:}\mspace{14mu} {\exists{u \in {c\mspace{14mu} {such}\mspace{14mu} {that}\mspace{14mu} u\mspace{14mu} {connected}\mspace{14mu} {to}\mspace{14mu} p}}}}} \} }} & (4)\end{matrix}$

where, c refers to locations within a level of geographical locations, urefers to the users, p refers to objects, and G refers to a level ofgeographical locations. Based on the LP and DF thresholds the tf-idfvalues associated with an object may be determined using the examplefunction below:

$\begin{matrix}{{{tfidf}( {p,c} )} = \{ \begin{matrix}{{{{tf}^{\prime}( {p,c} )}*{{idf}( {p,{G(c)}} )}},} & {{{if}\mspace{14mu} {{tf}^{\prime}( {p,c} )}} \geq {{LP}\mspace{14mu} {or}\mspace{14mu} {{DF}( {p,c} )}} \leq {DF}} \\{0,} & {{{if}\mspace{14mu} {{tf}^{\prime}( {p,c} )}} < {{LP}\mspace{14mu} {and}\mspace{14mu} {{DF}( {p,c} )}} > {DF}}\end{matrix} } & (5)\end{matrix}$

In one embodiment, the social networking system 140 ranks 320 therelevant objects associated with a level of geographical partitions. Thesocial networking system 140 may use a variety of ranking techniques torank 320 the relevant objects. In one embodiment, the social networkingsystem 140 ranks the relevant objects within a level of geographicalpartitions based on the number of connections associated with a relevantobject. For example, within a zip code, relevant objects with a largernumber of connections to users located within the zip code are given ahigher rank (e.g., pages fanned by more users are ranked higher). Inanother embodiment, the social networking system 140 ranks the relevantobjects within a level of geographical partitions based on the tf-idfvalue associated with a relevant object. In one embodiment, the socialnetworking system stores an identifier identifying the rank and level ofgeographical partitions associated with a relevant object in the contentstore 210. In another embodiment, the social networking system 140stores the ranked relevant objects for each level of geographicalpartitions in the content store 210.

FIG. 3 b is a flowchart illustrating an example process for recommendingrelevant objects to users of the social networking system. The socialnetworking system 140 obtains 330 location information identifying thelocation of a user. The social networking system 140 may retrieve thelocation information associated with the user profile of the user fromthe user profile store 205. For example, the social networking systemmay retrieve the user's residential or primary address associated withthe user's user profile. Alternatively, the social networking system 140may retrieve the location of the user's device being used to access thesocial networking system, on receiving permission from the user, andinfer from the location of the user's device the location of the user.Examples of location information that may identify the location of theuser's device include GPS coordinates or an IP address. The socialnetworking system may then infer from the GPS coordinates or the IPaddress the location of the user, for example a zip code encompassingthe GPS coordinates. The user might also be associated with more thanone location (e.g., a work location, a home location, etc.) such thatthe user could, for example, be associated with more than one zip code.In this case, the social networking system 140 may pick one of thelocations or use more than one location in recommending objects to theuser.

Based on the location information identifying the location of a user,the social networking system 140 may identify 340 one or more levels ofgeographical partitions associated with the user. In one example, thelocation information associated with the user is an address to aresidence including a zip code value. Based on the zip code value, thesocial networking system 140 identifies 340 additional zip codesadjacent to the zip code as well as the county, and state within whichthe zip code value is located. The social networking system may alsoidentify counties and states adjacent to the identified county and statewithin which the zip code value is located.

For each level of geographical partitions associated with the user, thesocial networking system 140 identifies 315 relevant objects, such aspages, to recommend to the user. The relevant objects represent objectsthat one located within a geographical partition, such as a zip code,would find relevant or objects with which one would be interested ininteracting. In one embodiment, the social networking system 140accesses or retrieves the pre-ranked relevant objects for each level ofgeographical partitions encompassing the location of the user, stored inthe content store 210. In another embodiment, the social networkingsystem 140 identifies relevant objects for each level of geographicalpartitions using the process described with respect to FIG. 3 a above.Thus, the system 140 can perform the ranking at the time of determininga recommendation for a user or can perform the ranking in advance andsimply retrieve or accesses pre-ranked objects for each level. In someembodiments, the system 140 re-ranks the objects each time it provides arecommendation to the user to get the most up-to-date ranking.

The social networking system 140 blends 360 or merges 360 the rankedrelevant objects at each level of geographical partitions to generate asingle set of relevant objects to recommend to the user. A number oftechniques may be applied to blend or merge the relevant objectsidentified at each level of geographical partitions. For example, thesocial networking system 140 may merge a threshold number of relevantobjects from each level of geographical partitions based on the rankassociated with each relevant object. For instance, the socialnetworking system may merge the top 5 tf-idf ranked relevant objects ateach level of geographical partitions into a set of relevant objects torecommend to the user. In one example, the social networking system 140may leverage a Bayesian process analyzing the recent historicalperformance of the ranked relevant objects at each level of geographicalpartitions, or at locations within each level of geographical partitions(e.g. user fanning history over the past 90 days) to remove locallyrelevant objects which do not meet a certain threshold, such as thenumber of connections associated with the relevant object. The socialnetworking system 140 may then blend or merge the remaining objects intoa single set of relevant objects to recommend to the user.

In one embodiment, the social networking system 140, assigns therelevant objects with a weighted rank based on a weight assigned to alocation within a level of geographical partitions. This results in thesocial networking system 140 merging and ranking the various relevantobjects associated with the different levels of geographical partitions,by assigning a weight to locations associated with one or more users whoare connected to the relevant objects. This approach has value for anumber of reasons. First, small regions have smaller samples and by thede Moivre equation this leads to high variance in the measured number ofconnections to objects. As the coarseness of the partitions increases,the number of samples increase which leads to a decrease in the varianceof the number of connections to an object. Thus, it may be beneficial toblend the results from the different levels of geographical locations toreduce the deficiencies that occur due to either a high variance or lowvariance in the number of connections to an object. By associating aweight with a location within each level of geographical partitions,locally relevant objects may be ranked higher than globally relevantobjects during the blending of the relevant objects identified at eachlevel of geographical partitions.

The following is one example of an equation used to determine a weightedrank for an identified relevant object. The variables are defined as: rrefers to the rank, i refers to the level of geographical locations, crefers to locations within the level of geographical locations, u refersto the number of users, p refers to objects, w refers to the weightassociated with any location within the level of geographical locations,and P refers to the frequency distribution associated with a locationwithin the level of geographical partitions. The rank is determinedusing the following equation:

$\begin{matrix}{{r( {u,p} )} = {{\sum\limits_{i}\; {w_{i}*{P_{c_{i}{(u)}}(p)}}} + {\lambda*{\sum\limits_{i}\; w_{i}^{2}}}}} & (6)\end{matrix}$

Similarly a tf-idf weighted rank may be assigned to an object based onthe weight assigned to a location within a level of geographicalpartitions. Let w_(i) ^(tfidf) be a weight associated with any locationwithin the level of geographical location i for a recommendationidentified by tf-idf. The tf-idf weighted rank for a relevant object maybe calculated by using equation (6), by replacing w_(i) with w_(i)^(tfidf).

In one embodiment, the social networking system 140 blends 360 therelevant objects by ranking the relevant objects from the various levelsof geographic partitions based on a combination of the number ofconnections associated with the relevant objects within a level ofgeographical partitions and the tf-idf value associated with therelevant objects. In another embodiment, the social networking system140 blends 360 the relevant objects based on the paths between locationswithin levels of geographical partitions as defined by a hierarchicalgraph or tree. As the hierarchy is a tree there is a unique path betweenany two locations within a level of geographical partitions. Oneexample, method of ranking the relevant objects is discussed below. Thispath first ascends the hierarchy between locations (referred to ass_(i), below) in a sub path then it descends the hierarchy in a sub pathbetween locations (referred to as t_(i), below). Let a_(i;j) be definedas a constant weight value for ascending between partitions levels G_(i)and G_(j), and let b_(i;j) be a defined as a constant weight value fordescending between partition levels G_(j) and G_(i). Then we have agraph distance d between any two locations c and c′ defined as:

$\begin{matrix}{{{d( {c,c^{\prime}} )} = {\sum\limits_{0 < i < n}\; a_{G{(s_{i})}}}},{G_{({s_{i} + 1})} + {\sum\limits_{m > i > 0}\; b_{G{(t_{i})}}}},G_{({t_{i} - 1})}} & (7)\end{matrix}$

From this a ranking function may be defined as:

$\begin{matrix}{{r( {u,p} )} = {\sum\limits_{c^{\prime} \in H}\; {{d( {{c(u)},c^{\prime}} )}*P_{c^{\prime}{(p)}}}}} & (8)\end{matrix}$

where, H is the hierarchy of levels of geographic partitions and Prefers to the frequency distribution associated with a location withinthe level of geographical partitions. Similarly, ranking or blendingfunctions can be defined based on the tf-idf values assigned to eachrelevant object.

In another embodiment, the social networking system 140 may perform asecondary ranking of the blended relevant objects based on informationassociated with the user profile, the relevant object or the demographicwith which the user is associated. For example, the social networkingsystem 140 further ranks the blended relevant objects based on themarital status, age, or gender of the user, and the demographic of theusers connected to the relevant objects.

The social networking system 140 may also use a machine learningalgorithm to blend and rank the relevant objects. The machine learningalgorithm may be trained using one or more data sets including rankedrelevant objects for users located in different locations. For example,the machine learning algorithm determines a probability of a userinteracting with relevant objects for each level of geographicpartitions based on the demographic information associated with therelevant object and the user, engagement information associated with therelevant object, the demographic information associated with one or morelevels of geographic partitions associated with the relevant object, orthe number of connections associated with a relevant object within agiven level of geographic partitions. Based on the probabilitydetermined, the social networking system 140 may rank the relevantobjects and blends the relevant objects into a single set of relevantobjects.

The social networking system 140 then selects 325 relevant objects torecommend to the user from the set of blended relevant objects torecommend to the user. In one embodiment, the social networking system140 selects relevant objects based on the rank of the relevant objectsin the blended set of relevant objects. For example, the socialnetworking system 140 selects 325 the top 20 ranked relevant objects inthe set of blended relevant objects to recommend to the user. The socialnetworking system 140 recommends the selected relevant objects to theuser via one or more recommendation units.

The selected relevant objects for a user can then be presented fordisplay to a user in the social networking system 140. In oneembodiment, the system 140 selects the highest ranked objects from themerged set of objects (e.g., the top 20 or top 50). The socialnetworking system 140 might provide a newsfeed to the user and somewhereon the page that includes the news feed (e.g., in a side margin), thesystem can provide a list of recommended objects for the user. Forexample, the user's newsfeed page in the social networking system 140might include a “Pages you Might Like” section in a margin along theside of the page or as a newsfeed item within the news feed. Thisrecommendations section can provide a list of all of the selectedrelevant objects or pages, or a top few pages. In addition, the socialnetworking system 140 might show a first few of the recommended pages,and then when the user refreshes the page or navigates to a new page,the system 140 might show the next few of the recommended pages. If thesocial networking system 140 has identified 50 total recommended pagesfor the user, the system 140 can continue to cycle through this listuntil all recommendations have been provided. The system 140 can alsooccasionally re-determine the top pages if a certain amount of time haspassed or it is determined that a new ranking should be performed to geta new set of recommended pages.

FIG. 4 is an example of recommending objects to a user of a socialnetworking system, according to one embodiment. The social networkingsystem 140 obtains the location information associated with the user400, as described in conjunction with FIG. 3 above. Based on thelocation information of the user 400, the social networking system 140identifies levels of geographical partitions encompassing the locationof the user, and for each level of geographical partitions the socialnetworking system 140 retrieves, accesses or identifies relevantobjects, as described in conjunction with FIG. 3 above. In this example,the social networking system 140 identifies 3 levels of geographicpartitions, a zip code 405 level, a county level 410, and a state 415level.

For the zip code 405 level the social networking system accessesrelevant objects 431, 432, 433 and 434 from the content store 210. Forthe county 410 level the social networking system 140 accesses relevantobjects 431, 435, 436, and 437 from the content store 210. For the state415 level the social networking system 140 accesses relevant objects431, 435, 438 and 439 from the content store 210. The social networkingsystem 140 then blends and ranks the relevant objects as described inconjunction with FIG. 3 above. For example, the social networking system140 may leverage a Bayesian process analyzing the recent historicalperformance of the ranked relevant objects at each level of geographicalpartitions, to remove locally relevant objects which do not meet acertain threshold. The social networking system 140 may then blend ormerge the remaining objects into a single set of relevant objects 450 torecommend to the user. In this example, the social networking system 140merges and selects objects 431, 432, 435, 436 and 438 to recommend 450to the user.

SUMMARY

The foregoing description of the embodiments of the invention has beenpresented for the purpose of illustration; it is not intended to beexhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed.Persons skilled in the relevant art can appreciate that manymodifications and variations are possible in light of the abovedisclosure.

Some portions of this description describe the embodiments of theinvention in terms of algorithms and symbolic representations ofoperations on information. These algorithmic descriptions andrepresentations are commonly used by those skilled in the dataprocessing arts to convey the substance of their work effectively toothers skilled in the art. These operations, while describedfunctionally, computationally, or logically, are understood to beimplemented by computer programs or equivalent electrical circuits,microcode, or the like. Furthermore, it has also proven convenient attimes, to refer to these arrangements of operations as modules, withoutloss of generality. The described operations and their associatedmodules may be embodied in software, firmware, hardware, or anycombinations thereof.

Any of the steps, operations, or processes described herein may beperformed or implemented with one or more hardware or software modules,alone or in combination with other devices. In one embodiment, asoftware module is implemented with a computer program productcomprising a computer-readable medium containing computer program code,which can be executed by a computer processor for performing any or allof the steps, operations, or processes described.

Embodiments of the invention may also relate to an apparatus forperforming the operations herein. This apparatus may be speciallyconstructed for the required purposes, and/or it may comprise ageneral-purpose computing device selectively activated or reconfiguredby a computer program stored in the computer. Such a computer programmay be stored in a non-transitory, tangible computer readable storagemedium, or any type of media suitable for storing electronicinstructions, which may be coupled to a computer system bus.Furthermore, any computing systems referred to in the specification mayinclude a single processor or may be architectures employing multipleprocessor designs for increased computing capability.

Embodiments of the invention may also relate to a product that isproduced by a computing process described herein. Such a product maycomprise information resulting from a computing process, where theinformation is stored on a non-transitory, tangible computer readablestorage medium and may include any embodiment of a computer programproduct or other data combination described herein.

Finally, the language used in the specification has been principallyselected for readability and instructional purposes, and it may not havebeen selected to delineate or circumscribe the inventive subject matter.It is therefore intended that the scope of the invention be limited notby this detailed description, but rather by any claims that issue on anapplication based hereon. Accordingly, the disclosure of the embodimentsof the invention is intended to be illustrative, but not limiting, ofthe scope of the invention, which is set forth in the following claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method comprising: obtaining locationinformation identifying a location of a user of a social networkingsystem; identifying, based on the location information, one or morelevels of geographical partitions that are associated with the user,each level representing a geographical area encompassing the location ofthe user identified by the location information; accessing, for eachlevel of geographical partitions associated with the user, locallyrelevant objects, each relevant object connected to a number of users ofthe social networking system having location information identifying alocation within the level of geographical partitions; merging therelevant objects accessed at each of the levels of geographicalpartitions associated with the user, the merging based on a number ofthe users that are connected to the relevant objects and that each havelocation information identifying a location of the user within thelevel; and selecting one or more of the merged relevant objects torecommend to the user.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein obtaininglocation information identifying the location of a user comprisesretrieving the location information from a user device used by the user.3. The method of claim 1, further comprising: identifying a termfrequency-inverse document frequency value associated with each of theaccessed relevant objects, the term frequency-inverse document frequencyvalue determined based on the number of users connected to each relevantobject and a number of locations within the levels of geographicalpartitions including a user of the social networking system who isconnected to the object; and merging the relevant objects accessed ateach level based on the term frequency-inverse document frequencyassociated with each relevant object.
 4. The method of claim 3 furthercomprising: ranking the accessed relevant objects based on the termfrequency-inverse document frequency associated with each relevantobject; merging the relevant objects based on the rank associated witheach relevant object.
 5. The method of claim 3 further comprising:ranking the accessed relevant objects based on a weight associated witha location within the level of geographical locations, the locationhaving been identified from the location information of users connectedto the relevant object; and merging the relevant objects accessed ateach level based on the rank associated with each accessed relevantobject.
 6. The method of claim 5 wherein the weight associated with alocation is based on the term frequency-inverse document frequencyassociated with the relevant object.
 7. The method of claim 3 furthercomprising: ranking the accessed relevant objects based on a distancebetween locations within the levels of geographical locations based onpaths between the locations in a hierarchical graph or tree; and mergingthe relevant objects based on the rank associated with each relevantobject.
 8. The method of claim 1 further comprising: identifyingaccessed relevant objects at each level with greater than a thresholdnumber of connections; and merging the identified accessed relevantobjects with greater than the threshold number of connections.
 9. Acomputer program product comprising a computer-readable storage mediumcontaining computer program code for: obtaining location informationidentifying a location of a user of a social networking system;identifying, based on the location information, one or more levels ofgeographical partitions that are associated with the user, each levelrepresenting a geographical area encompassing the location of the useridentified by the location information; accessing, for each level ofgeographical partitions associated with the user, locally relevantobjects, each relevant object connected to a number of users of thesocial networking system having location information identifying alocation within the level of geographical partitions; merging therelevant objects accessed at each level based on a number of the usersthat are connected to the relevant objects and that each have locationinformation identifying a location of the user within the level; andselecting one or more of the merged relevant objects to recommend to theuser.
 10. The computer program product of claim 9, wherein obtaininglocation information identifying the location of a user comprisesretrieving the location information from a user device used by the user.11. The computer program product of claim 9, further comprising:identifying a term frequency-inverse document frequency value associatedwith each of the accessed relevant objects, the term frequency-inversedocument frequency value determined based on the number of usersconnected to each relevant object and a number of locations within thelevels of geographical partitions including a user of the socialnetworking system who is connected to the object; and merging therelevant objects accessed at each level based on the termfrequency-inverse document frequency associated with each relevantobject.
 12. The computer program product of claim 11, furthercomprising: ranking the accessed relevant objects based on the termfrequency-inverse document frequency associated with each relevantobject; merging the relevant objects based on the rank associated witheach relevant object.
 13. The computer program product of claim 11,further comprising: ranking the accessed relevant objects based on aweight associated with a location within the level of geographicallocations, the location having been identified from the locationinformation of users connected to the relevant object; and merging therelevant objects accessed at each level based on the rank associatedwith each accessed relevant object.
 14. The computer program product ofclaim 13, wherein the weight associated with a location is based on theterm frequency-inverse document frequency associated with the relevantobject.
 15. The computer program product of claim 11, furthercomprising: ranking the accessed relevant objects based on a distancebetween locations within the levels of geographical locations based onpaths between the locations in a hierarchical graph or tree; and mergingthe relevant objects based on the rank associated with each relevantobject.
 16. The computer program product of claim 9, further comprising:identifying accessed relevant objects at each level with greater than athreshold number of connections; and merging the identified accessedrelevant objects with greater than the threshold number of connections.17. A method comprising: obtaining location information identifying alocation of a user of a social networking system; identifying, based onthe location information, one or more levels of geographical partitionsthat are associated with the user, each level representing ageographical area encompassing the location of the user identified bythe location information; accessing, for each level of geographicalpartitions associated with the user, locally relevant objects, eachrelevant object connected to a number of users of the social networkingsystem having location information identifying a location within thelevel of geographical partitions, and the locally relevant objectsassociated with a rank based on the number of users connected to therelevant object having location information identifying a location withthe level of geographical partitions; identifying the relevant objectsaccessed at each level having greater than a threshold number of theusers that are connected to the relevant objects and that each havelocation information identifying a location of the user within thelevel; merging the identified relevant objects accessed at each levelinto a single set of relevant objects; and selecting one or more of therelevant objects in the single set of relevant objects to recommend tothe user.
 18. The method of claim 17, further comprising: identifying aterm frequency-inverse document frequency value associated with each ofthe accessed relevant objects, the term frequency-inverse documentfrequency value determined based on the number of users connected toeach relevant object and a number of locations within the levels ofgeographical partitions including a user of the social networking systemwho is connected to the object; ranking, for each level, the accessedrelevant objects based on the term frequency-inverse document frequencyvalue associated with each of the accessed relevant objects; and mergingthe relevant objects based on the rank associated with each relevantobject.
 19. The method of claim 17, further comprising: identifying aterm frequency-inverse document frequency value associated with each ofthe accessed relevant objects, the term frequency-inverse documentfrequency value determined based on the number of users connected toeach relevant object and a number of locations within the levels ofgeographical partitions including a user of the social networking systemwho is connected to the object; ranking, for each level, the accessedrelevant objects based on a weight associated with a location within thelevel of geographical locations, the location having been identifiedfrom the location information of users connected to the relevant object,the weight associated with a location based on the termfrequency-inverse document frequency value associated with the accessedrelevant objects; and merging the relevant objects based on the rankassociated with each relevant object.